SMART CITIES, SUSTAINABILITY, AND INDIGENOUS PEOPLES’ WISDOM

Authors

  • David Mesquiati de Oliveira

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56238/revgeov16n4-057

Keywords:

Smart Cities, Sustainability, Indigenous Peoples, Krenak, Sociosemiotics

Abstract

This article critically examines the hegemonic concept of Smart Cities, which is frequently limited to technological advancements and economic interests. Its objective is to juxtapose the Western vision of sustainability and urban progress with the wisdom of Indigenous peoples, particularly drawing from the contributions of Ailton Krenak, and with Milton Santos's critique of the urban question. This aims to construct a more inclusive and genuinely sustainable understanding of the urban future. The methodology employed articulates the analysis of geographic space as a social and political instance, as proposed by Milton Santos, with Eric Landowski's sociosemiotics. The latter is utilized to decipher the underlying discursive structures in Ailton Krenak's works (A vida não é útil, Ideias para adiar o fim do mundo, O amanhã não está à venda), allowing an exploration of how the author deconstructs Western anthropocentrism and proposes a reconfiguration of human-nonhuman relations. Key findings reveal that the predominant conception of Smart Cities, by prioritizing technology and utilitarian logic, contributes to the perpetuation of social inequalities and "mutilated citizenship," as theorized by Santos. In contrast, Krenak's Indigenous perspective challenges the techno-scientific "power-to-do" and "know-how," repositioning nature as an actant and life as an intrinsic, non-utilitarian value. A truly intelligent city, according to this articulation, would be one that recognizes the plurality of knowledges, challenges incessant production and consumption, promotes autonomy and co-responsibility with the territory, and integrates non-Western rationalities and the "institution of dreaming" as guides for equitable and resilient development. The study concludes that the integration of Indigenous wisdom and geographical critique is crucial for Smart Cities to transcend technocratic rhetoric and become environments that promote social inclusion, the ethics of life, and de-alienation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ABNT NBR ISO 37122:2020. Indicadores de Cidade Inteligente. Rio de Janeiro: ABNT, 2020.

ALONSO, Andre Deak. Morte e vida de cidades inteligentes: tecnologia, colonialismo e antropoceno. Tese (Doutorado em Design) – Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2023.

BOUSKELA, M. et al. Caminho para as Smart Cities: da Gestão Tradicional para a Cidade Inteligente. Brasília: Banco Interamericano de Desenvolvimento (BID), 2016.

BRASIL. Secretaria Nacional de Mobilidade e Desenvolvimento Regional e Urbano. Carta Brasileira para Cidades Inteligentes. Brasília: SMDRU, 2021.

CHOURABI, H. et al. Understanding Smart Cities: An integrative framework. 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, p. 2289-2297, 2012. DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2012.615.

COMISSÃO Brundtland. Nosso futuro comum. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Getúlio Vargas, 1987.

CORRÊA, Roberto Lobato. O espaço urbano. São Paulo: Ática, 1989.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Smart Cities and Communities. Brussels: European Commission, 2019.

FRANCISCO Jr et al (org.). Cidades Inteligentes: uma abordagem humana e sustentável. Série Estudos estratégicos, nº 12. Brasília: Câmara dos Deputados, Edições Câmara, 2021. Disponível em: https://bd.camara.leg.br/bd/items/0fb0d78d-e608-420d-95eb-48dbf5170efe.

GEHL, Jan. Cidades para pessoas. 2. ed. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 2013.

GIFFINGER, R. et al. Smart Cities: Ranking of European medium-sized cities. Vienna: Vienna University of Technology, 2007.

JACOBS, Jane. Morte e vida de grandes cidades. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2018.

KRENAK, Ailton. A vida não é útil. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2020a.

KRENAK, Ailton. O amanhã não está à venda. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2020b.

KRENAK, Ailton. Ideias para adiar o fim do mundo. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2019.

LANDOWSKI, Eric. A sociedade refletida: ensaios de sociossemiótica. São Paulo: Educ; Pontes, 1992.

LOPES, Daniel; LEITE, Vittorio. Cidades Inteligentes: conceitos e aplicações. Brasília: EvEx, 2021.

MONFAREDZADEH, N.; BERARDI, U. Sustainability assessment of Smart Cities: A review. Energy Procedia, v. 75, p. 87-93, 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.202.

RANKING CONNECTED SMART CITIES. Connected Smart Cities 2023. São Paulo: Urban Systems; Necta, 2024.

REIA, Jess; CRUZ, Luã. Cidades inteligentes no Brasil: conexões entre poder corporativo, direitos e engajamento cívico. Cadernos Metrópole, v. 25, p. 467-490, 2023.

SANTOS, Milton. A urbanização brasileira. São Paulo: Edusp, 1993.

SANTOS, Milton. O espaço do cidadão. 7 ed. São Paulo: Editora da Universidade de São Paulo, 2007.

SENNE, M. C. Índice de Sustentabilidade e Integração do Transporte e Logística Urbana (ISITransLog). Tese (Doutorado em Engenharia de Produção) - Universidade Federal de Itajubá, Minas Gerais, 2021.

UN-HABITAT. World Cities Report 2020: The Value of Sustainable Urbanization. Nairobi: United Nations Human Settlements Programme, 2020.

UNITED NATIONS. Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations, 2015.

Published

2025-09-22

How to Cite

de Oliveira, D. M. (2025). SMART CITIES, SUSTAINABILITY, AND INDIGENOUS PEOPLES’ WISDOM. Revista De Geopolítica, 16(4), e706. https://doi.org/10.56238/revgeov16n4-057