COMPARISON BETWEEN GROUPS IN THE MONTHLY OCCURRENCE OF SNAKEBITES, MUNICIPALITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL, 2008-2017

Authors

  • Ana Paula da Conceição Fernandes de Amorim
  • Luis Sauchay Romero
  • Moana Ferreira dos Santos
  • Maria Cristina Schneider
  • Simone Aranha Nouér
  • Ricardo Pereira Igreja

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56238/revgeov16n5-254

Keywords:

U Test, Poisoning, Neglected Tropical Disease, Antivenom, Botropic Accident

Abstract

Every year, an estimated 2.7 million people suffer snakebites, causing up to 138,000 deaths. The WHO aims to reduce snakebite-related deaths and disabilities by 50% by 2030. This study presents data on variables related to the snakebite cases in the city of Rio de Janeiro between 2008 and 2017. During this period, 495 cases were recorded, 89.1% caused by snakes of the genus Bothrops (B. jararaca and B. jararacuçu), whose venom has proteolytic and hemorrhagic effects. Half of the cases were mild (49.8%), and 86.7% received antivenom treatment. Only 9.9% of victims were treated within the first hour, 42.4% within three hours, 15.7% after six hours, and 21.1% had no recorded treatment time. Recovery occurred in 89.5% of cases. Most bites happened in urban areas (96.3%) and affected mainly men (68.1%) aged 19–59 years (mean 35 years). The lower limbs were the most affected sites, and 43.4% of victims had no recorded occupation. Local manifestations such as pain, edema, and erythema were most frequent, while systemic symptoms were rare. Coagulation tests showed abnormalities in 46.1% of cases, and 20.9% of victims did not undergo testing. Men had a higher hospitalization rate (67.3%) and an average hospital stay of seven days. The Lourenço Jorge Municipal Hospital accounted for 88.7% of treatments, followed by Pedro II Hospital (6.3%), both located in the West Zone, which recorded the highest number of cases.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullahi, A., Yusuf, N., Debella, A., et al. (2022). Seasonal variation, treatment outcome, and its associated factors among snakebite patients in Somali Region, Ethiopia. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.901414

Amorim, A. P. da C. F. de, & Santos, M. F. dos. (2021). Ofidismo: Doença tropical negligenciada de grande impacto na saúde mundial. In G. M. da Costa One (Org.), Saúde: Os desafios da pesquisa na atualidade (pp. 421–443). João Pessoa, PB. https://cinasama.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/LIVRO-SAÚDE-I-2021.pdf

Aragon, D. C., de Queiroz, J. A. M., & Martinez, E. Z. (2016). Incidence of snakebites from 2007 to 2014 in the State of São Paulo, Southeast Brazil, using a Bayesian time series model. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, 49(4), 515–519. https://doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0138-2016

Bhaumik, S., Beri, D., Tyagi, J., Clarke, M., Sharma, S. K., Williamson, P. R., et al. (2022). Outcomes in intervention research on snakebite envenomation: A systematic review. F1000Research, 11, 628. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.122116.1

Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. (2025). Acidentes por animais peçonhentos. https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/assuntos/saude-de-a-a-z/a/animais-peconhentos

Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. (2025). SINAN–DATASUS. https://datasus.saude.gov.br/informacoes-de-saude-tabnet/

Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. (2023). Informe de distribuição de imunobiológicos aos estados. https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/vacinacao/distribuicao-de-imunobiologicos/situacao-da-distribuicao-de-imunobiologicos-aos-estados-para-a-rotina-do-mes-de-jul-2023

Bravo-Vega, C., Santos-Vega, M., & Cordovez, J. M. (2022). Disentangling snakebite dynamics in Colombia: How does rainfall and temperature drive snakebite temporal patterns? PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010270

Buitendag, J., Variawa, S., Madeira, D., & Oosthuizen, G. V. (2022). A comparison between adult and paediatric snakebites and their outcomes in North Eastern South Africa. Toxicon, 208, 13–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2021.12.009

Chippaux, J. P., Massougbodji, A., & Habib, A. G. (2019). The WHO strategy for prevention and control of snakebite envenoming: A sub-Saharan Africa plan. Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins Including Tropical Diseases, 25, e20190083. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-9199

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587

Daswani, B. R., Chandanwale, A. S., Kadam, D. B., Ghongane, B. B., Ghorpade, V. S., & Manu, H. C. (2017). Comparison of different dosing protocols of anti-snake venom (ASV) in snakebite cases. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 11(9), FC17–FC21. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/20132.10670

Erickson, L. T., Litschka-Koen, T., Pons, J., Bulfone, T. C., Bhendile, G., Fuller, S., et al. (2020). The ‘Snake song’: A pilot study of musical intervention in Eswatini. Rural and Remote Health, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.22605/RRH5494

Gutiérrez, J. M. (2020). Snakebite envenoming from an ecohealth perspective. Toxicon: X, 7, 100043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxcx.2020.100043

Harrison, R. A., Casewell, N. R., Ainsworth, S. A., & Lalloo, D. G. (2019). The time is now: A call for action to translate recent momentum on tackling tropical snakebite into sustained benefit for victims. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 113(12), 834–837. https://doi.org/10.1093/trstmh/try134

Hollander, M., Wolfe, D. A., & Chicken, E. (2014). Nonparametric statistical methods (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Jenkins, T. P., & Laustsen, A. H. (2020). Cost of manufacturing for recombinant snakebite antivenoms. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 8, 703. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009880

Kanankege, K., Turner, M., Moos, B., Ruiz de Castaneda, R., Nikiema Nidjergou, Y. N., Seidu Korkor, A., et al. (2023). Interim report on snakebite incidence and case fatality rates in sub-Saharan Africa. Weekly Epidemiological Record, 98(18), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-025-01385-7

Lavonas, E. J., Burnham, R. I., Schwarz, J., Quackenbush, E., Lewis, B., Rose, S. R., et al. (2020). Recovery from Copperhead snake envenomation: Role of age, sex, bite location, severity, and treatment. Journal of Medical Toxicology, 16, 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-019-00733-y

Levine, M., Ruha, A. M., Wolk, B., Caravati, M., Brent, J., Campleman, S., et al. (2020). When it comes to snakebites, kids are little adults: A comparison of adults and children with rattlesnake bites. Journal of Medical Toxicology, 16, 444–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-020-00776-6

Magalhães, S. F. V., Peixoto, H. M., Freitas, L. R. S., Monteiro, W. M., & Oliveira, M. R. F. (2022). Snakebites caused by the genera Bothrops and Lachesis in the Brazilian Amazon: A study of factors associated with severe cases and death. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Tropical Medicine, 55, e0558-2021. https://doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0558-2021

Mangiafico, S. S. (2023). Summary and analysis of extension program evaluation in R (v. 1.20.05). https://rcompanion.org/handbook/F_04.html

Mary, A., Wittler, B., Hiestand, B., Bantikassegn, A., Cline, D. M., & Hannum, J. L. (2025). Outcomes of Copperhead snake envenomation managed in a clinical decision unit. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 26(4). https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.20369

Minghui, R., Malecela, M. N., Cooke, E., & Abela-Ridder, B. (2019). WHO’s snakebite envenoming strategy for prevention and control. The Lancet Global Health, 7(7), e837–e838. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30225-6

Mise, Y. F., Lira-da-Silva, R. M., & Carvalho, F. M. (2019). Fatal snakebite envenoming and agricultural work in Brazil: A case–control study. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 100(1), 150–154. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.18-0579

Patikorn, C., Ismail, A. K., Abidin, S. A. Z., Blanco, F. B., Blessmann, J., Choumlivong, K., et al. (2022). Situation of snakebite, antivenom market and access to antivenoms in ASEAN countries. BMJ Global Health, 7(3), e007639. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007639

Pejak, D. T., Adam, V. N., & Srzić, I. (2022). Venomous snakebites in Croatia: Clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment. Acta Clinica Croatica, 61, 59–66. https://doi.org/10.20471/acc.2022.61.s1.10

Sagar, P., Bammigatti, C., Kadhiravan, T., Harichandrakumar, K. T., Swaminathan, R. P., & Reddy, M. M. (2020). Comparison of two anti–snake venom protocols in hemotoxic snakebite: A randomized trial. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 73, 101996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2020.101996

Schneider, M. C., Min, K. D., Hamrick, P. N., Montebello, L. R., Ranieri, T. M., Mardini, L., et al. (2021). Overview of snakebite in Brazil: Possible drivers and a tool for risk mapping. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009044

Schneider, M. C., Vuckovic, M., Montebello, L., Sarpy, C., Huang, Q., Galan, D. I., et al. (2021). Snakebites in rural areas of Brazil by race: Indigenous people as the most exposed group. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179365

Warrell, D. A., & Williams, D. J. (2023). Clinical aspects of snakebite envenoming and its treatment in low-resource settings. The Lancet, 401(10385), 1382–1398. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00002-8

World Health Organization. (2025). Snakebite envenoming. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/snakebite-envenoming

World Health Organization. (2019). Snakebite: WHO targets 50% reduction in deaths and disabilities. https://www.who.int/news/item/06-05-2019-snakebite-who-targets-50-reduction-in-deaths-and-disabilities

World Health Organization. (2018). Addressing the burden of snakebite envenoming. https://doi.org/10.20471/acc.2022.61.s1.10

Downloads

Published

2025-12-09

How to Cite

de Amorim, A. P. da C. F., Romero, L. S., dos Santos, M. F., Schneider, M. C., Nouér, S. A., & Igreja, R. P. (2025). COMPARISON BETWEEN GROUPS IN THE MONTHLY OCCURRENCE OF SNAKEBITES, MUNICIPALITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL, 2008-2017. Revista De Geopolítica, 16(5), e1113. https://doi.org/10.56238/revgeov16n5-254