TAX BURDEN AND ECONOMIC COMPLEXITY: AN ANALYSIS OF G20 COUNTRIES

Authors

  • Hugo Leonardo Menezes de Carvalho
  • Mônica Aparecida Ferreira

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56238/revgeov17n1-174

Keywords:

Tax Burden, Economic Complexity, G20

Abstract

The study examined the relationship between tax burden and economic complexity in G20 countries, aiming to address the gap in research that has not directly tested this association. While prior studies link tax burden to per capita income and economic complexity to inequality and income, the interaction between the first two factors remains unexplored. A quantitative methodology was employed, estimating a panel data model using tax burden, economic complexity, per capita income, innovation, and inequality data from G20 countries between 2012 and 2021. Results revealed a positive and statistically significant relationship between economic complexity, per capita income, and tax burden, corroborating previous findings but with the distinction of using aggregated national-level data focused on globally significant economies. Hypotheses linking innovation and income inequality to tax burden were not confirmed. The research contributes to the literature by validating the relationship between tax burden and economic complexity, incorporating variables and national proxies not previously analyzed together. The findings may inform public policies for economic development, particularly those aimed at diversification through industrialization, which also impact tax systems. Furthermore, the study expands empirical research on the assumptions of economic complexity theory, broadening its applicability to other contexts. Thus, it stands out not only for confirming theoretical relationships but also for its methodological focus on central economies in the global landscape, offering insights for debates on taxation and structural growth strategies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ADAM, A.; KAMMAS, P.; LAPATINAS, A. Income inequality and the tax structure: Evidence from developed and developing countries. Journal of Comparative Economics, v. 43, n. 1, p. 138-154, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2014.05.006

ALMEIDA, E. R. F. de; ARAUJO, V. de C. Teoria da complexidade econômica e desigualdade de renda: Evidências para a Região do Grande ABC (2000-2010). Gestão; Regionalidade, v. 36, n. 108, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13037/gr.vol36n108.5717

ATROSTIC, B. K.; NUNNS, J. R. Measuring tax burden: A historical perspective. In: BERNDT, E. R.; TRIPLETT, J. E. (Ed.). Fifty years of economic measurement: The jubilee of the Conference on Research in Income and Wealth. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990. p. 343-420. Disponível em: https://www.nber.org/system/files/chapters/c5981/c5981.pdf

BAER, W.; GALVÃO JR., A. F. Tax burden, government expenditures and income distribution in Brazil. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, v. 48, n. 2, p. 345-358, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2006.12.012

CARVALHO, H. L. M.; ÁVILA, L. A. C. Tax governance: A study of its effects on tax evasion. Brazilian Business Review, v. 19, n. 4, p. 454–474, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2022.19.4.6

CELIKAY, F. Dimensions of tax burden: A review on OECD countries. Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Science, v. 25, n. 49, p. 27-44, 2020. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jefas-12-2018-0138

CLEMENTE, F. Analysis of the Brazilian tax incentives to innovation and patent data: a Principal-Agent model approach. Revista Finanzas y Política Económica, v. 13, n. 2, p. 403-437, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14718/revfinanzpolitecon.v13.n2.2021.6

DELGADO, F. J.; FERNÁNDEZ-RODRÍGUEZ, E.; MARTÍNEZ-ARIAS, A. Size and other determinants of corporate effective tax rates in US listed companies. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, n. 98, p. 160-165, 2012. Disponível em: https://www.internationalresearchjournaloffinanceandeconomics.com/ISSUES/IRJFE_98_15.pdf

DIVINO, J. A.; MACIEL, D. T. G. N.; SOSA, W. Government size, composition of public spending and economic growth in Brazil. Economic Modelling, v. 91, p. 155-166, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.06.001

FERNÁNDEZ-RODRÍGUEZ, E.; MARTÍNEZ-ARIAS, A. Determinants of the effective tax rate in the BRIC countries. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, v. 50, Sup3, p. 214-228, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/REE1540-496X5003S313

FERNÁNDEZ-RODRÍGUEZ, E.; GARCÍA-FERNANDEZ, R.; MARTÍNEZ-ARIAS, A. Business and institutional determinants of effective tax rate in emerging economies. Economic Modelling, v. 94, p. 692-702, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.02.011

FERRAZ, D. et al. Economic complexity and human development: Comparing standard and slack-based data envelopment analysis models. Revista CEPAL, n. 137, 2022. Disponível em: https://hdl.handle.net/11362/48580

GALA, O. Complexidade econômica: uma nova perspectiva para entender a antiga questão da riqueza das nações. Rio de Janeiro: Contraponto, 2017.

GÓMEZ-GONZÁLEZ, J. E.; URIBE, J. M.; VALENCIA, O. M. Does economic complexity reduce the probability of a fiscal crisis? Working Paper. Barcelona: Institut de Recerca en Economia Aplicada Regional i Pública, 2022. Disponível em: https://www.ub.edu/irea/working_papers/2022/202218.pdf

GUJARATI, D. N. Econometria básica. 4. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier-Campus, 2006.

GUJARATI, D. N.; PORTER, D. C. Econometria básica. 5. ed. Porto Alegre: AMGH, 2011.

HARTMANN, D. Economic complexity and human development: How economic diversification and social networks affect human agency and welfare. Londres: Routledge, 2014.

HARTMANN, D. et al. Linking economic complexity, institutions and income inequality. World Development, v. 93, p. 75-93, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.020

HAUSMANN, R. et al. The atlas of economic complexity: Mapping paths to prosperity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9647.001.0001

HIDALGO, C. A.; HAUSMANN, R. The building blocks of economic complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), v. 106, n. 26, p. 10570-10575, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900943106

HILL, C.; GRIFFITHS, E.; JUDGE, G. Econometria. 3. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2006.

IOSIFIDI, M.; MYLONIDIS, N. Relative effective taxation and income inequality: Evidence from OECD countries. Journal of European Social Policy, v. 27, n. 1, p. 57-76, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928716672182

JACOB, M. Uma nota sobre a pesquisa tributária. Revista Contabilidade; Finanças, v. 29, n. 78, p. 339-342, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201890280

KUTNER, M. H.; NACHTSCHEIM, C.; NETER, J. Applied linear regression models. Nova York: McGraw-Hill, 2004.

LAPATINAS, A.; KYRIAKOU, A.; GARAS, A. Taxation and economic sophistication: Evidence from OECD countries. PLoS ONE, v. 14, n. 3, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213498

LAPATINAS, A.; LITINA, A. Intelligence and economic sophistication. Empirical Economics, v. 57, p. 1731–1750, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-018-1511-y

MONDJELI, M. N.; NOMO-BEYALA, B. C. Does Economic Complexity matter for the Mobilisation of Tax Revenues? Preprint. Research Square, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2440422/v1

PHAM, M. H.; TRUONG, H. D. H.; HOANG, D. P. Economic complexity, shadow economy, and income inequality: Fresh evidence from panel data. International Economic Journal, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10168737.2024.2311704

QI, Y.; PENG, W.; XIONG, N. N. The effects of fiscal and tax incentives on regional innovation capability: Text extraction based on python. Mathematics, v. 8, n. 7, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math8071193

RAMOS, L. et al. A Governança econômica global e os desafios do G-20 pós-crise financeira: análise das posições de Estados Unidos, China, Alemanha e Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional, v. 55, p. 10-27, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-73292012000200002

RIEDEL, N. Quantifying international tax avoidance: A review of the academic literature. Review of Economics, v. 69, n. 2, p. 169-181, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/roe-2018-0004

RIVERA, B. et al. Analysis of the effect of human capital, institutionality and globalization on economic complexity: Comparison between Latin America and countries with greater economic diversification. Economies, v. 11, n. 8, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11080204

SHERAZ, M. et al. Moderating the effect of globalization on financial development, energy consumption, human capital, and carbon emissions: Evidence from G20 countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, v. 28, p. 35126–35144, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13116-0

STOJKOSKI, V.; KOCAREV, L. The relationship between growth and economic complexity: Evidence from Southeastern and Central Europe. MPRA Paper, n. 77837, 2017. Disponível em: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/77837/3/MPRA_paper_77837.pdf

TEIXEIRA, R. A.; PINTO, E. C. A economia política dos governos FHC, Lula e Dilma: Dominância financeira, bloco no poder e desenvolvimento econômico. Economia e Sociedade, v. 21, n. 4, p. 909–941, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-06182012000400009

WINNER, H. Has tax competition emerged in OECD countries? Evidence from panel data. International Tax and Public Finance, v. 12, p. 667–687, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-005-2915-0

Published

2026-02-04

How to Cite

de Carvalho, H. L. M., & Ferreira, M. A. (2026). TAX BURDEN AND ECONOMIC COMPLEXITY: AN ANALYSIS OF G20 COUNTRIES . Revista De Geopolítica, 17(1), e1451. https://doi.org/10.56238/revgeov17n1-174